|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Home > Forum Activities > Working Groups > Trade > Bushmeat > Bushmeat Working Group Activities > Subgroups > Codes of Conduct for Logging Companies > Ape Alliance |
|
||||||
|
|
Bushmeat Working Group Activities Codes of Conduct for Logging CompaniesApe AllianceModel for a 'Code of Conduct' to minimise the impact of hunting in logging concessionsThese are the steps that the Ape Alliance would like to see logging firms implement:
[* concessions includes those that you have holdings in.] In addiition to this set of measures there should be a separate sheet detailing national wildlife law, a list of protected animals, and 'recommended actions/methods' relating to the enumerated points such as: re. 6. The Ape Alliance realises that this may take some time to implement, but expects you to work towards full provision of protein for workers on your concessions. This can be done by providing meat through outlets on site at or near to cost price. re. 9. The use of snares is indiscriminate and affects species of animals that are protected by national and international law. It is, therefore, necessary to prevent their use. This can be done by limiting the availability of wire on the concessions, but would also be controlled by a ban on exportation of meat, and by increased provision of protein. Additionally, snares could be checked for by certifiers and other enforcement bodies on the ground. re. 10. This could be done by destroying bridges and ploughing up side cuttings and roads. The former is cheap as bridges are constructed of local timber and therefore on reentering a concession can be rebuilt from the same materials cut on site. The ploughing of side roads not only inhibits vehicle access deeper into the forest, but also promotes secondary growth which can be beneficial to some species including gorillas and elephants. Richard Banwell (pers. comm.) makes the following points about the code of conduct.
|
||||||||